Spinal Decompression | Non Surgical Versus Surgical Spinal Decompression

Non Surgical Versus Surgical Spinal Decompression

People suffering from back and neck pains arising out of compression of the vertebral disks (and the subsequent displacement of vertebral disk material into space that is supposed to be occupied by nerves) can be treated through either non surgical or surgical spinal decompression. It is, of course, not a question of either just going for one or the other, since there are specific circumstances when the non surgical spinal decompression is used, just as there are circumstances where the surgical spinal decompression has to be used.

In terms of effectiveness, properly performed, both non surgical and surgical spinal decompression are equally effective in the treatment of back and neck pains resulting from the displacement of vertebral disk material into space that is occupied by nerves. Indeed, the only core difference between non surgical and surgical spinal decompression is the medium and method used to get the displacement vertebral disk material back into the disk; where in the non surgical case, subtle force application equipment backed by specialized software are used in getting the displaced material back into the disk, while in the surgical spinal decompression, the treatment involves surgically opening up the patient and performing procedures to get the displaced disk material back into the disk.

In terms of treatment times, it can be said that surgical spinal decompression is an ‘instant treatment’ (in that the patient leaves the operating table with the vertebral disk material that was causing trouble back in its rightful place), whereas non surgical spinal decompression is more of a gradual treatment process, requiring twenty sessions to get the displaced vertebral disk material back into the disk. But while surgical spinal decompression might be termed as an ‘instant treatment’ one need to keep in mind that they would need a considerable period of time to recuperate from the effects of the surgery, often ending up being grounded for longer than the three to four weeks it takes to go through non surgical spinal decompression.

In terms of cost, non surgical spinal decompression is often termed as a more cost-effective method for the treatment of the range of back and neck pains that can be treated through spinal decompression than surgical spinal decompression; although it should be noted that not non surgical spinal decompression is not a very cheap treatment either.

And in terms of risk, non surgical spinal decompression is termed as a less risky treatment method than the surgical spinal decompression – though it should also be noted that the non surgical spinal decompression is not absolutely risk free, and neither is it a treatment option of everyone, hence the need for extensive tests and physical examination, before one can be put through the non surgical spinal decompression.

Filed Under Types Of Spinal Decompression Therapies | Leave a Comment

Tagged With , , , ,

Comments

Leave a Reply